People love their pets, and most of them are not willing to live anywhere their animals are unwelcome. A lot of apartment managers believe that allowing animals ends up costing them money and causing problems. There is reliable research that suggests letting tenants have pets can be good for business. The pet friendly apartments in West Ashley are popular and financially successful.
It may be hard to find an apartment building that is small and allows pets, but about half of the larger complexes allow certain types and sizes of animals. Cats are welcome more often than dogs, and large dogs are seldom allowed. Owners with unusual pets, like reptiles, will probably have to find other accommodations. Those with more than one pet usually have fewer rental choices. Most complexes require a special deposit for pets that is not refunded when the owner moves out.
Complexes that let tenants have pets traditionally charge more rent per unit than those that don't. Most renters are willing to pay more if their pets are welcome. The difference in fees is considerable in some cases. Apartment buildings with strict rules regarding pet type and size cannot charge as much as those that are more flexible.
Another benefit for managers who allow animals is the length of time their residents stay as opposed to complexes with pet restrictions. Renters with pets tend to stay over three years while renters in the other complexes commonly move out after just a year. Complexes that welcome residents with pets have far fewer vacancies, which is also a cost savings. They do less advertising and marketing, and they require less maintenance than those complexes that have a high turnover rate.
Problems like damage and noise that managers assume go along with letting pets in their buildings are not as severe as they imagine. Research shows that damages occurred in less than half the units where animal owners lived. Tenant complaints about barking didn't rise significantly either. Insurance is a little higher for buildings with pets, but this is offset by the higher rent charged.
When researchers looked at the damage renters with pets and without pets caused, the difference turned out to be inconsequential. People with pets know how difficult it can be to find a good place to rent that welcomes pets so they tend to be very careful and obey the management rules.
What invariably happens in complexes with restrictions against pets is that tenants keep animals illegally. It is difficult to know exactly what percentage of residents do this because most who are asked will deny having an animal. In these cases, the complexes have the issues associated with allowing pets without the benefits.
Complexes that allow pets usually have residents that are happier and less inclined to move. Most animal owners make good tenants who abide by management rules and keep their units in good condition. Allowing pets can be very good for business.
It may be hard to find an apartment building that is small and allows pets, but about half of the larger complexes allow certain types and sizes of animals. Cats are welcome more often than dogs, and large dogs are seldom allowed. Owners with unusual pets, like reptiles, will probably have to find other accommodations. Those with more than one pet usually have fewer rental choices. Most complexes require a special deposit for pets that is not refunded when the owner moves out.
Complexes that let tenants have pets traditionally charge more rent per unit than those that don't. Most renters are willing to pay more if their pets are welcome. The difference in fees is considerable in some cases. Apartment buildings with strict rules regarding pet type and size cannot charge as much as those that are more flexible.
Another benefit for managers who allow animals is the length of time their residents stay as opposed to complexes with pet restrictions. Renters with pets tend to stay over three years while renters in the other complexes commonly move out after just a year. Complexes that welcome residents with pets have far fewer vacancies, which is also a cost savings. They do less advertising and marketing, and they require less maintenance than those complexes that have a high turnover rate.
Problems like damage and noise that managers assume go along with letting pets in their buildings are not as severe as they imagine. Research shows that damages occurred in less than half the units where animal owners lived. Tenant complaints about barking didn't rise significantly either. Insurance is a little higher for buildings with pets, but this is offset by the higher rent charged.
When researchers looked at the damage renters with pets and without pets caused, the difference turned out to be inconsequential. People with pets know how difficult it can be to find a good place to rent that welcomes pets so they tend to be very careful and obey the management rules.
What invariably happens in complexes with restrictions against pets is that tenants keep animals illegally. It is difficult to know exactly what percentage of residents do this because most who are asked will deny having an animal. In these cases, the complexes have the issues associated with allowing pets without the benefits.
Complexes that allow pets usually have residents that are happier and less inclined to move. Most animal owners make good tenants who abide by management rules and keep their units in good condition. Allowing pets can be very good for business.
About the Author:
Discover the best pet friendly apartments in West Ashley by touring our web pages today. To learn more about our floor plans and our amenities, use the links at http://thecarlyleaptssc.com .
No comments:
Post a Comment